Once against the words of Archpriest Symeon Elias were proved to be prophetic.

I first predicted that the West would go all out to destroy Vladimir Putin and redouble their goal for the total conquest of Russia in 2007 when Putin made his first anti-unipolar speech. John McCain sat on the front row and vocally cursed him. I was a member of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church in America, which had joined the Kyivan Rus Synod in the 1990s. It was the goal to create a genuine and autonomous Ukrainian Orthodox Church, not under the control of the old K.G.B apparatus and certainly not under the control the Mossad and the C.I.A. Over the course of nearly fifteen years, I discovered that the C.I.A. had taken over this "church"; they were using Nationalist NAZIS and disaffected Marxists in Ukraine to create a challenge to Russia. The plot revealed that the goal was to take down Russian Culture using Ukraine as the westernized battering ram.



My Bishop, a survivor of the Holodomor, had been hoodwinked into joining. When he discovered the truth of what was happening, he told me, "The good Churchmen of Ukraine are all dead, killed by the communist or escaped to the West, not old and tired. Nothing is left in Ukraine, in the Ukraine Church but liars and thieves. They have lied to me about everything." This man was for years the head of the Ukrainian-American Society and loved the U.S. and Ukraine.




I wrote about the CIA's takeover of the Ukrainian Church at the time, and the drumbeat came to have me removed from the list of the clergy. After my bishop refused to defrock me for telling the truth, the Ukrainian Synod removed him, leaving the clergy under him, without a bishop, when shortly he reposed. I stated many times that Ukrainian Orthodoxy, under the Greeks in the U.S., and the breakaway "churches" in Ukraine were owned by the C.I.A. and had become a C.I.A. operation. It is still true today, and we see the Greeks and the Ecumenical Patriarch barking for their C.I.A./Soros/Mossad masters.




In 2007 I wrote that the impetus behind Russia's hesitancy to be absorbed into the West was not about economics. At the time, all the so-called "experts" only talked about Russia regarding economics. However, Putin's statements about "the right to preserve national culture" was code for protecting Christian culture, which was ignored by the world media. It was not ignored by the Anglo-Judeo-Luciferian Oligarchs who are hellbent on destroying every vestige of Christian culture, (i.e., Christian Traditional Morality) as they morph Christianity into Ecumenical One World Paganism. You have seen multiple examples of this, like the surrender to the rainbow culture and as you saw demonstrated in Quebec, Canada, this week, with the Pope and several Cardinals of the Roman Church participating in a pagan ritual, invoking not the name of Jesus Christ and the Holy Trinity, but the pagan western grandmother god and her seven spirits. Just a week before, we saw the head of the Greek Orthodox Church in America preformed a pair of openly Gay Baptisms.




Russia and Putin strove from 1999 through the Trump years to integrate into the Western Economic System. Not trusting the motives of the Western "carrot," it prepared to face the NATO whip, creating alliances and economic structures it would need to survive the West's onslaught.




From 2007 to today, I have consistently said that the conquest of Russia has little to do with economics, as the so-called experts say, but about the destruction of Christian Moral Tradition in Russia and killing any resistance to the Ecumenical Pagan, One World Religion. People thought I was nutz.




All the "friendship talk" remained between the West and Russia until 2013. During those years, they tried to subvert Putin's resolve to protect Christian Culture. But when it became clear that the Russians were rejecting Western LGBTQXYZBS propaganda and decided to pass a law protecting their children from it, all hell broke loose in the Media, and suddenly Putin was the new Adolf Hitler. Putin's quiet return was to kick all the C.I.A./Soros N.G.O.s out of Russia. By that, taking control of the narrative, the political/propaganda discourse. Today, the great disconnect between what has happened in Ukraine and the Western Media's portrayal of it is due to the N.G.O.'s (C.I.A.) control of the Western Media. Yes, if you have missed the message, the assault on Russia is an assault by the LGBTQXYZBS Global Luciferian Cabal, whose motive is anti-God, and anti-Christ. And, unfortunately, very pro-American. America has taken Lucifer's side. Here is the Brookings Institute in their own words, confirming what I've told you.



B.T.W., the Brookings Institute is Anglo-Judeo-Luciferian, as are most of America's so-called NGOs and "think tanks."


brookings.edu

What does a Pride parade have to do with NATO? More than you might think.
James Kirchick

6-7 minutes

What does a Pride parade have to do with NATO? More than you might think.

Earlier this month, I moderated a conference in Vilnius, Lithuania, in conjunction with the country’s hosting of Baltic Pride. The annual event alternates among the capitals of the three Baltic states, bringing together thousands of LGBTQ people and their allies from across the region for a week-long program of panel discussions, film screenings and performances, culminating in a festive parade through the city center.

The following week, I traveled to Finland, Estonia and Latvia on a study tour organized by the Hudson Institute to meet with presidents, defense officials, cybersecurity experts and other specialists to discuss the security environment in Northern Europe.

Thus were two of my primary professional interests joined: I am working on a book about the history of gay Washington, and my day job consists of analyzing transatlantic relations. While they might seem like completely different spheres of intellectual pursuit, they are connected, in my mind, by a common thread.

The political West is ultimately a community of values. Two such values, perhaps the two most fundamental, are the freedom of speech and assembly. One doesn’t have to be a supporter of same-sex marriage or gay adoption or any other contentious social issue to believe that the right of people to demonstrate and speak their mind is sacrosanct in a democratic society.

The degree of respect for LGBTQ people has increasingly become a measure of democratic health in former Soviet states. While gay-rights demonstrations in the Baltics were once met with feces-flinging counterprotesters in 2006, this month’s celebration was unmarked by any such ugliness. All I saw were smiling faces, happy families and solidarity among people gay and straight.

Contrast this progress with the dire situation next door. Since 2013, when the Russian Duma unanimously passed a law prohibiting the “promotion of nontraditional sexual relations” to minors, it has been illegal for any Russian—homosexual or heterosexual—to speak positively about gay people or their rights. (Shortly after this draconian measure was passed, I protested the law on a live broadcast of Russia Today and got kicked off the Kremlin-backed network.) Russians who advocate gay rights are arrested and fined, LGBTQ websites are blocked, and a steady exodus of gay people has trickled out of Russia over the past six years. Emboldened by the Kremlin, Chechnya’s government has once again unleashed a pogrom against gay men.

Marija Golubeva, a recently elected member of the Saeima, the Latvian Parliament, told me it is often “not religious feelings, but the heritage of Soviet ideology” that determines the extent to which a nation respects LGBTQ equality. Countries that overcome their totalitarian pasts—as the Baltic states have admirably done, shedding their command economies and authoritarian political structures for membership in NATO and the European Union—will progress toward recognizing the basic dignity of their gay and lesbian citizens.

“The share of people who say that religion is very important in their lives is higher in Spain and Norway than in Lithuania and Latvia, or even in Russia,” Golubeva said. “Yet it is in Spain and not in Russia that people of the same sex can marry.” Golubeva is just the second openly gay politician in Latvia, following the country’s foreign minister, who came out in 2014 and is still serving.

Keenly aware of the anxieties many socially conservative people in the former Soviet space harbor about homosexuality, the Kremlin exploits the issue for geopolitical aims. On Sunday, thousands marched for LGBTQ rights in Ukraine, a country that has paid a hard price for its Western aspirations in the form of Russian occupation forces on its sovereign territory. As part of its propaganda narrative, Moscow paints pro-West Ukrainians as wishing to subsume the country under “Gayropa.”

Now consider Georgia: Like the Baltics, it is a former Soviet republic, but luckless geography places it outside the civilizational umbrella provided by NATO and the E.U. The spirit of the Stonewall uprising in New York, which occurred 50 years ago this week, lives on the streets of Tbilisi: On June 14, gay-rights activists demonstrated outside the main government building to demand police protection for an upcoming Pride march. They were attacked by far-right activists as police passively looked on.

In my study tour group’s meetings with Baltic officials, the question repeatedly came up of why the United States should risk blood and treasure in the defense of tiny countries along Russia’s border. Former House speaker Newt Gingrich, then acting as a campaign surrogate for Donald Trump, gave voice to this sentiment during the 2016 presidential election when he said that Estonia was just some place in “the suburbs of St. Petersburg.”

For an answer to that “why” question, I will defer to Natan Sharansky, the dissident whose quest to free his fellow Jews from Soviet captivity helped bring about the evil empire’s collapse.

Years ago, Sharansky came up with a “town square test” to distinguish the free society from what he termed a “fear society.” Can a person walk into the town square and express his opinion without fear of being arrested or harmed? “The understanding of linkage between democracy and peace was always very seldom understood,” Sharansky told me last month. “And that’s why it is our highest interest that our neighbors have democratic rule and not dictators.”

One suspects that if Russia were a place where Pride parades were allowed, its quarrels with the United States, and ours with it, would diminish.
+++

You could not state it clearer. This isn't about economics, it is about the destruction of Traditional Christianity. Only in a world given over to the Great Liar, could protecting children from LGBTQ GROOMING be called, "Draconian" and cruel. _ Archpriest Symeon Elias