Truth the Foreign Language

  • My friend Joan Robinson is a patriot and truth seeker. We have been exchanging ideas on Facebook, for nearly a decade, I believe. I was in the Swamp, no, the real one in South Georgia, awoke in the middle of the night, I flipped on my IPhone and was greeted with the words Joan had written, saying, "Fair enough . . ."  I was shocked at what I read, since Joan was treating Truth like it was a foreign language that "her" friends could not hear without abandoning her.

     
    Fair enough.....but what are you going to DO about all this Massie?




    • Reply
    • 14h

  • Archpriest Symeon Elias
    Ignorant or lying politician gaslighting the public using the language of a fallen republic and a constitution that holds no reality other than a museum piece. It was nullified by national security laws decades ago, making his comment gaslighting nostalgia. And here I thought Joan lived in reality and had a clue.

    • Reply
    • 11h

  • Joan Aries Robinson
    A clue???? Really? Pointing out that talk is cheap has opened a few eyes in my experience with trying to show people the truth.
    1

    • Reply
    • 11h
    • Edited

  • Archpriest Symeon Elias
    Well discounting your emotional response, are we in a functioning CONSTITUTIONAL Republic or not? This politician’s statement can only have meaning in a Constitutional Republic. Do you remember me (Butch Robinson , talking about that we all suffer cognitive dissonance? You can’t believe what this politician said and any of the reality I know you have gained in part from my work. The two paradigms of reality are totally different and hold no common ground. One is fantasy based on conditioning and nostalgia, and the other is real based on mountains of evidence of history and documentation, not to mention the last Globalist controlled election.

    • Reply
    • 11h

  • Archpriest Symeon Elias
    The politician isn’t engaged in “cheap talk” but rather powerful nostalgia conditioned psyop.

    • Reply
    • 11h

  • Joan Aries Robinson
    Discounting your ASSUMPTION of my "emotions" Yes I know who you are and have not forgotten anything I've learned from you. Like yourself, I have a particular audience or following - most of them do NOT know you or your teachings, but they are open to learning, just not the way you present, which is often harshly, and taken as insult.
    But by all means feel free to share some of your teachings on my posts - simply leave out the assumptive comments about my knowledge (or lack thereof) and emotions....

    • Reply
    • 10h

  • Archpriest Symeon Elias
    No I won’t comment again. Can’t handle the soft soap for ego’s sake when people are being enslaved and Genocided; sort of like saying “pardon me” before screaming fire with no seconds to spare.

    • Reply
    • 10h

  • Joan Aries Robinson
    Whatever you need to do dear.

    • Reply
    • 10h

  • Archpriest Symeon Elias
    Thanks for the patronizing, “Dear.” Is the residual feminist daddy hate? ❤️🙏🏻☦️😎

    • Reply
    • 10h

  • Joan Aries Robinson
    You regularly mistake my intent for things said and unsaid - you always have, just more of your assumptions. So now who is lashing out emotionally, or is that guilt over being somewhat insulting on someone else's page when you won't tolerate it on your own?

    • Reply
    • 9h


    • Reply
    • 9h

  • Archpriest Symeon Elias
    I didn’t read your intent, and have NEVER responded to your intent, some motivation inside you, Rather, I read the meaning of your words and responded because it matters. Words have meaning, use them. Or would you rather we await your mysterious intent?

    • Reply
    • 9h

  • Joan Aries Robinson
    Perhaps that's what you THINK you did Butch, but then I'm sure you also realize that words often have different meanings dependent on cultural background, education and life experience. You often have trouble with people misunderstanding you for it, just recently explaining your use of "idiot" on another post for example.
    Now you started all this with insult, were you "intending" to be provocative with: "And here I thought Joan lived in reality and had a clue."?
    What was your "motivation" for that statement? Just reading those words by "classic" or dictionary definition - again, you would not tolerate others doing such on your own page.

    • Reply
    • 4h

  • Archpriest Symeon Elias
    What I stated was honest dismay. You can waltz around it and say your intent was something other but your post was anachronistic AND in the language of nostalgic gaslighting. Yes, that surprised me and I stated the TRUTJ of it.

    • Reply
    • 4h

  • Joan Aries Robinson
    Sorry to disappoint then, even if you have no idea why I said what I did or posted what I did. Perhaps the message wasn't meant for you.

      • Reply
      • 4h






  • Archpriest Symeon Elias
    Joan, I’m on the road away from my computer please DO NOT delete this post so I can use it as an example of the constant hypnotic pull to slip back into the matrix of CIA Herding lies.

    • Reply
    • 11h

    Joan Aries Robinson
    Archpriest Symeon Elias I'm not deleting anything. Your previous comment has value, except for the sledge.
    1

    • Reply
    • 11h

  • Archpriest Symeon Elias
    We all slip into the language of the psyop, it is almost impossible not to, and every bow to the language is a conditioning toward the mindset and worldview.
    1

    • Reply
    • 10h

  • Joan Aries Robinson
    Yes, I agree.
    1

      • Reply
      • 10h






  • Ron Price
    Yet not a single soul has started any impeachment. WTH gives????

    • Reply
    • 4h

  • Ron Price
    I think it's time we the people tie the hands and tape the mouths of every Demorat on the HIll. 🙁

      • Reply
      • 3h
___________________________________________

  • Now let us talk about the Rittenhouse self-defense case.
  •  Rittenhouse, isolated self-defense case.

    Public
    If I were a psyops master wishing to dispirit Gun Rights/self-defense advocates, I'd push a meme of the Judge in the Rittenhouse Trial berating the prosecutor, I would have people exposing the prosecutors tampering with video evidence and I would have every Q level thinker in the country convinced Kyle's acquittal was inevitable. Then I would have him found guilty and sentenced to a very long prison term. He may be acquitted, I'm not a gambler, but show trials are show trials and a lot of you have been suckered back into the left/right matrix with this theatrical production. Maybe they will throw you a bone, a Rittenhouse acquittal? Stranger things have happened. But I've also seen actor judges whipping up self-promotion, and even sympathy for the defendant before a guilty verdict and harsh sentences.
    • Butch Robinson Wrote five days ago:

      Public
      I am so removed from the psyops media, that I had never heard the name Rittenhouse until the second week in November 2021. How ever did I survive?  (From August 2020, to November 2021).  I looked it up.  I did see the name, and told people they were focusing on the wrong thing and called it Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman 2.0.

      9 Comments


      Rex Christi
      It was on my timeline when it happened and it was an integral part of the Summer of Love and COVID psyop because it gave them a face for White Supremacy and Big Black Guns.
      4

      • Reply
      • 6d
      Elaine Frye Jones
      I still don't know who he is. I saw a clip of him crying but I'm clueless.

      • Reply
      • 1d

      Mary Thrasher Yeargin Lowery
      Elaine Frye Jones he shot a rioter in self defense during the love fest … I hope he gets all charges dropped and sues the city and the media!!

      • Reply
      • 1d


      • Reply
      • 1d

    • Archpriest Symeon Elias
      He is the latest isolated self defense case the enemy is using to distract and paralyze those who will not surrender Liberty. They have idiots focused on this when the world powers with the cooperation of national governments are committing genocide. Focus People.

      The Rittenhouse case has been "atrocitized" for Psyop use, as Rex Christi suggested.  How do we know?  Well, for days it has dominated so-called conservative media, and people are sucked into the right/left dialectic and frothing at the mouth, "hang him" or "he is innocent, let him go."  This psyops ploy has a deep history.

      From the Washington Post in 2012 during the Trayvon Martin George Zimmerman-self defense case.


      What so few of you understand, at the core of your soul, making it your mindset and worldview, is that you continue to think, speak and respond in a false paradigm.  It is a paradigm, as I was trying to point out to Joan Robinson, that is produced by a psychological operation decades in the making, and to converse IN that dialectic, and not constantly challenge that dialectic, is to surrender to the lies and further the lies.

      Most of you Christians are still locked in the Luciferian Worldview, think and act from that point of view, and think that because you hold some moral ideas that are being challenged and mocked, that makes you a real Christian with a Christian Worldview. Truthfully, most of the Christian I encounter hold a less accurate and truthful worldview than the speed freak Jordon Peterson or the fellow pictured and speaking in my last video entitled, "Approximations of Truth, Truer than YOUR Truth."

      Note that in the paragraph above I am speaking of perception of Truth, not about the state of ones healing salvation.  I am talking about a worldview without any delusions or illusion or distortions of truth.


      What is a secularist fundamentalist? Go to my video entitled, "Idiot Beliefs that are Killing Us." You will find a list of the most essential Secularist Fundamentalist Religious Beliefs that atheists, agnostics, and run-of-the-mill religious secularists (Luciferians) share in common.  Those truly dedicated to that darkness have sold their soul to Lucifer and stand without hope. However, most people accept different layers and levels of the great lies of the Luciferians while thinking they are "awake" and truly understand what is happening in the world.







      I chided Franklin Graham some weeks ago, because he was promoting the Luciferian Nano-Technology they are calling vaccines.  It is impossible to read it any other way than he believed and promoted a death engendering LIE.




      “I hope that the pastors in the pulpit would tell people how they can be saved from God’s judgment, and that’s through faith in Jesus Christ,” Graham said. “I think for a pastor to tell someone not to take the vaccine is problematic because what would happen if that person died [from the Coronavirus] then is a pastor responsible?… I mean, I would feel responsible.” - Franklin Graham

       What was Franklin Graham's deep theological reasoning for herding people to a deadly gene-altering nano-technology biologic they are falsely calling a Vaccine? You will see his theology was not very deep. Firstly, he expressed a lack of faith and preponderance of fear of embarrassment.

      “Anytime there was a vaccine or something that could help protect you, he was an advocate for, he took it.” Graham said. “I think if there were vaccines available in the time of Christ, Jesus would have made reference to them and used them.”

      “I believe it is consistent with Scripture that we protect our lives and do whatever we can to save life,” Graham said. “So I don’t have a problem with telling a person to take an aspirin or telling a person to have a vaccine.”

      Graham also expressed that vaccines are proof of God’s love.

      “I thank God for the doctors and the researchers that have put this time and effort and money to develop these vaccines, and I hope that the American people will use them,” Graham said.

      That is Luciferianism or Idiocy on display. And the snake bit him, and sadly he did not and maybe cannot confess. If you have been watching my channel or any of several channels and sites that are following the VARES. (Vaccine Adverse Reaction Event) on the CDC site, you know that Paricarditus is a common injury from the Covid Vaccine.



      Franklin Graham's vaccine teaching and the damage to himself and others is an event in the period some are calling "After God." In the After God period we live in, Christianity is equated with "niceness," with "going along to get along" as long as you don't sacrifice some mysterious possession called "my salvation." Every pusillanimous excuse of the quisling class functions as a rationale why bowing to the most dreadful evils don't affect "my salvation." These people have removed God to some narrow theological and religious realm, where TRUTH never interacts with LIFE, except in some limited moralistic fantasy.

      What Blinded Franklin Graham to the dangers of the Covid Vaccines? If it wasn't a big donation from Big Pharma, or some middle man money laundering foundation, and thus greed, papered over as "do'n God's work," then it was his capitulation of some level of Secularism, some level of Secularist Fundamentalism that would cause his blindness and allow this to happen to him, and to others.

      And if you want to know what blindness, pride, and hard-heartedness that statement he gave, thanking people for their prayers, as he exited one of the Nation's premier medical facilities, few can afford, even then he did not confess. THINK was value for TRUTH, GOODNESS and BEAUTY would have flowed from a confession on his part where he said, "It is possible, since it is a commonly reported injury for the vaccine, that the Covid Vaccine injured me. So for those considering taking the JAB, do your research and be sure of what you are doing."  He could even say, now the doctors tell me it is not related.  No, instead, he "saved face," he thinks, but his pride is stinking with wounded and dead bodies.

      You cannot be a secularist, any a secularist, even a secularist Christian, like Franklin Graham, without religious belief in at least some of the Fundamentals of Secularism. Such beliefs are Luciferian, and religious, even if you are an atheist or agnostic because they create your worldview without God.

      A friend commented on the video, "Approximations of Truth, Truer than YOUR Truth" after all the fellow walking in the wood in that video, holds more sanity than Franklin Graham. He is less of an idiot than Franklin Graham because he has not lost his ability to act in bodily autonomy to protect his own body. Anyway, hearing the people speak on the video feigning wisdom, without God, she said, "These people are Luciferian and without hope."
      I responded to her saying:

      Yes, there are those who are secularist fundamentalist, who hold all basic delusions of the enlightenment and believe in individual rights as expressed in liberal democracy, who do not realize why their world has turned radical death cult. They are still reachable, since though they ignore God have not relinquished all the Christian principles of previous generations. They don't realize that their belief in the immanence of being leaves them with no foundation for their beliefs.
       
      This is very different than those degenerated one step further who hold no concept of Truth, Goodness, and Beauty. For them, Genocide is a moral good. The previous group pictured in this video for reasons that are foundation-less believe tyranny, slavery, dishonesty, and genocide are bad, and some of them are reachable.
       
      The Evangelization of the Roman Empire was easier than such efforts two generations into the Post Christian Era because the Romans with its Greek culture held more in common with the enlightenment movement's liberal democracy than with the godless agnostics and atheists of our era who have substituted "nothing" for the reason and purpose of being, this done in philosophical comedy destroying all basis of reason and simultaneously all meaning.
       
      Saint Paul, a reasonable man, could say to the philosophers of Athen, "Friends, let us reason together," and that idea had mutual meaning. The exact words have no meaning in a fundamentalist secular society where it is mutually agreed there is no basis for reason. That man is Animal Only expressing passions in action and by relativist rationale devoid of any common ground prattles about meaning in empty phrases designed to evoke passion devoid of reason. Base passions are the motivations; meaningless words are given as reason. The emptiness of that man was stated, "He who dies with the most toys wins." One may substitute the material object to fit the particular demonic delusion of meaning, for instance, "he who clicks the greatest sexual encounters," "he who casts the best spells and creates the most slaves," "he who claims ownership of all he cannot truly own like land, currency, natural resources" "he who exerts the greatest influence and power" "she who owns the most shoes"... the list is limited only by the reality of material being and demonic delusion. With all the gain, at each point it is nothing, "I gotta get high, man," and it all vaporizes upon the last heartbeat, or sometimes in God's mercy, there is prolonged suffering where the folly of their materialism is exposed to them, and they turn to God.

      Having gained everything and nothing, those who do not turn to God might as well have not lived. Such animal-only agnostic and atheist, secular fundamentalists are without hope and impossible to reach with reason and convincing testimony and witness.
       
      Again, Secular Fundamentalists, having retained some glimmer of actual Truth, Goodness, and Beauty may be open to not more reasonable arguments but an encounter with God. They may positively respond to their philosophical house of cards evaporating before them.




    Comments

    Popular posts from this blog

    Chemtrails? You are a conspiracy theorist!

    America's Use of Biological Weapons on North Koreans and Chinese during the Korean War.

    The Reprobate Mind of a Mammon Worshiping Jew