principia-scientific.com

David E Martin: The Fauci / Covid-19 Dossier | Principia Scientific Intl.

14-18 minutes

---

Published on November 10, 2021

Written by veteranstoday.com

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services was involved in the funding of amplifying the infectious nature of coronaviruses between 1999 and 2002 before SARS was ever detected in humans.

Not only SARS-Cov-2 but also that of 2003 would have been created in the laboratory according to these words of the American doctor David E. Martin (pictured), author of the most voluminous scientific investigation with the unequivocal title “The Fauci / Covid-19 Dossier”.

In 26 pages “prepared for humanity” but easy to read only for those familiar with biochemistry, he narrated the intrigue between experiments on animal viruses artificially enhanced with molecular engineering, studies on vaccines with the Spike protein and messenger RNA (dating back to 2000 and 2013), including the names of Moderna and Pfizer, a swirl of billions of dollars financed by the US government, also through military funds DARPA, the Advanced Projects Research Agency of Defense controlled by the Pentagon, and used for patents registered by Anthony Fauci, or by some Big Pharma.

But what emerges with greater concern from a report worthy of an apocalyptic thriller as much as the effects deriving from the pandemic is the narration of the story of the “sorcerer’s apprentices”, so called by virologist Luc Montagnier, winner of the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 2008, precisely for research on the very dangerous chimeric superviruses.

Dr. Martin’s investigation shines the spotlight on the triad led by Fauci, director of NIAID, the National Institute of Infectious Diseases in the USA, and composed of two very famous researchers among those who have investigated the artificial origins of SARS-Cov-2 : Dr. Ralph Baric of the University of North Carolina and scientist Zhengli Shi, director of infectious diseases at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The dossier of the American doctor therefore confirms the theory of “a deal between China and the US” only mentioned by Professor Montagnier but the subject of numerous investigations in the WuhanGates cycle of Gospa News, summarized in the book of the same name. The complexity of the study of scientific literature (corroborated by 180 pages of pharmaceutical industrial patents) makes it necessary to divide our report into two parts: the first on vaccine experiments and research; the second on the macroscopic conflicts of interest around Fauci.

“This dossier is by no means exhaustive. It is, however, indicative of the many criminal violations that can be associated with COVID-19 terrorism. All the starting materials are cited here »writes Dr. Martin in the introduction after having outlined his ‘mission’“. The famous French virologist Lui Montagnier defined Fauci & co. “Sorcerer’s apprentices” for the superficiality with which they manipulated extremely dangerous viruses up to risky vaccines which, when inoculated in full pandemic, can become a ”weapon of mass destruction” for the creation of vaccine-resistant variants.

‘Over the past two decades, my company – M·CAM – has been monitoring possible violations of the 1925 Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous, or other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare (the Geneva Protocol) 1972 Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, and Stockpiling of Bacteriological and Toxin Weapons and Their Destruction (the BTWC). In our 2003-2004 Global Technology’ reads the dossier.

‘Vector Weaponization M·CAM highlighted China’s growing involvement in Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology with respect to joining the world stage in chimeric construction of viral vectors. Since that time, on a weekly basis, we have monitored the development of research and commercial efforts in this field, including, but not limited to, the research synergies forming between the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institutes for Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), Harvard University, Emory University, Vanderbilt University, Tsinghua University, University of Pennsylvania, many other research institutions, and their commercial affiliations‘ added Martin’s paper.

According to the report, the National Institute of Health’s grant AI23946-08 issued to Dr. Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (officially classified as affiliated with Dr. Anthony Fauci’s NIAID by at least 2003) began the work on synthetically altering the Coronaviridae (the coronavirus family) for the express purpose of general research, pathogenicenhancement, detection, manipulation, and potential therapeutic interventions targeting the same.

As early as May 21, 2000, Dr. Baric and UNC sought to patent critical sections of the coronavirus family for their commercial benefit.

‘In one of the several papers derived from work sponsored by this grant, Dr. Baric published what he reported to be the full length cDNA of SARS CoV in which it was clearly stated that SAR CoV was based on a composite of DNA segments. “Using a panel of contiguous cDNAs that span the entire genome, we have assembled a full-length cDNA of the SARS-CoV Urbani strain, and have rescued molecularly cloned SARS viruses (infectious clone SARS-CoV) that contained the expected marker mutations inserted into the component clones.”’ claimed the investigative doctor.

Reading about the chimerical construction of viral vectors, the so-called recombinant viruses, in the same paragraph in which there is mention of commercial affairs immediately makes the skin hoard but it is only a taste of the poisonous concoction from the tragedy brought to the surface by the pandemic: perhaps triggered by a release cause of artificial pathogens, perhaps produced by a premeditated dispersion aimed at a health, economic and military dictatorship of the New World Order, as mentioned in previous articles.

‘On April 19, 2002 – the Spring before the first SARS outbreak in Asia – Christopher M. Curtis, Boyd Yount, and Ralph Baric filed an application for U.S. Patent 7,279,372 for a method of producing recombinant coronavirus. In the first public record of the claims, they sought to patent a means of producing, “an infectious, replication defective, coronavirus.” – highlighted Martin – This work was supported by the NIH grant referenced above and GM63228. In short, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services was involved in the funding of amplifying the infectious nature of coronavirus between 1999 and 2002 before SARS was ever detected in humans‘.

THE ILLEGAL CDC PATENT

Against this backdrop, we noted the unusual patent prosecution efforts of the CDC, when on April 25, 2003 they sought to patent the SARS coronavirus isolated from humans that had reportedly transferred to humans during the 2002-2003 SARS outbreak in Asia» explains the dossier, however, noting a huge anomaly: 35 U.S.C. §101 prohibits patenting nature, because Supreme Court made it abundantly clear that the Court had “long held” that nature was not patentable. Merely isolating DNA does not constitute patentable subject matter.

“This legality did not deter CDC in their efforts. Their application, updated in 2007, ultimately issued as U.S. Patent 7,220,852 and constrained anyone not licensed by their patent from manipulating SARS CoV, developing tests or kits to measure SARS coronavirus in humans or working with their patented virus for therapeutic use. Work associated with this virus by their select collaborators included considerable amounts of chimeric engineering, gain-of-function studies, viral characterization, detection, treatment (both vaccine and therapeutic intervention), and weaponization inquiries” said Martin.

In addition, the CDC patented the detection of SARS CoV using a number of methods including reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). With this patent, they precluded anyone outside of their licensed or conspiring interest from legally engaging in independent verification of their claim that they had isolated a virus, that it was a causative agent for SARS, or that any therapy could be effective against the reported pathogen.

‘It is important to note that the CDC’s patent applications were also rejected in non-final and final rejections for ineligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 102 for being publicly disclosed prior to their own filing. In the first non-final rejection, the USPTO stated that the CDC’s genome was published in four Genbank accession entries on April 14, 18, and 21, 2003 with identity ranging from 96.8% to 99.9 percent identical sequences.5 Dr. Fauci knew, and failed to disclose evidence that the CDC patent was illegal, based on work he had funded in the years leading up to the SARS outbreak‘ noted the research.

In short, with Baric’s U.S. Patent 6,593,111 (Claims 1 and 5) and CDC’s ‘852 patent (Claim 1), no research in the United States could be conducted without permission or infringement.

‘We noted that gain-of-function specialist, Dr. Ralph Baric, was both the recipient of millions of dollars of U.S. research grants from several federal agencies but also sat on the World Health Organization’s International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) and the Coronaviridae Study Group (CSG). In this capacity, he was both responsible for determining “novelty” of clades of virus species but directly benefitted from determining declarations of novelty in the form of new research funding authorizations and associated patenting and commercial collaboration‘ reads the dossier.

“Together with CDC, NIAID, WHO, academic and commercial parties (including Johnson & Johnson; Sanofi and their several coronavirus patent holding biotech companies; Moderna; Ridgeback; Gilead; Sherlock Biosciences; and, others), a powerful group of interests constituted what we would suggest are “interlocking directorates” under U.S. anti-trust laws” claimed Martin.

These entities also were affiliated with the WHO’s Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB) whose members were instrumental in the Open Philanthropy-funded global coronavirus pandemic “desk-top” exercise EVENT 201 in October 2019. This event, funded by the principal investor in Sherlock Biosciences and linking interlocking funding partner, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation into the GPMB mandate for a respiratory disease global preparedness exercise to be completed by September 2020 alerted us to anticipate an “epidemic” scenario».

We expected to see such a scenario emerge from Wuhan or Guangdong China, northern Italy, Seattle, New York or a combination thereof, as Dr. Zhengli Shi and Dr. Baric’s work on zoonotic transmission of coronavirus identified overlapping mutations in coronavirus in bat populations located in these areas.

The reference to Event 201 requires us to remember that among the protagonists there was the lawyer Avril Haines, former deputy director of the Central Intelligence Agency for the Obama-Biden administration during which Baric’s experiments in Chapel Hill on recombinant superviruses, among SARS, MERS infected with HIV / AIDS plasmids prepared by Dr. Zhengli Shi, obtained the government waiver of the moratorium on Gain-of-Function tests.

Not only. Haines, a bio-weapons expert later promoted to deputy national security advisor to the White House (2015-2017), prophesied a coronavirus epidemic in a public conference in 2018, and a world order needed to counter it. Why be surprised if the new American president Joseph Biden, funded in the election campaign by Pfizer (controlled by the multinational GSK which refers to Bill Gates), has appointed Haines to the National Intelligence Directorate of all the United States of America?

Martin’s report provides further evidence to support the complaint of lawyer Robert F. Kennedy jr, nephew of President JFK and son of his namesake US Attorney General, both killed in mysterious crimes in the shadow of the so-called Deep State: the potentate of financiers, mostly Zionists like those who speculate on Pfizer, Freemasons, politicians and military intelligence. 

PANDEMIC PLANNED FOR DECADES BY FAUCI AND GATES

For Kennedy, the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic was “planned for decades by Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates”. The crude chronological reconstruction of this rich Covid-19-dossier seems to prove him right. In fact, here are some of the salient dates mentioned by Dr. Martin in his detailed research work.

First reference to the “emergence” of CoV as a respiratory pathogen in 2000 Ralph Baric AI23946 and GM63228 of the National Institutes of Health actively working CoV recombinants. In 2001 the National Institute of Health, Allergies and Infectious Diseases (Anthony Fauci’s NIAID) publishes. “Reverse Genetics with a Coronavirus Infectious cDNA Construct.” 4/1 / 2001-3 / 31/005 $ 1.0 million in total costs / year. RS Baric,

In 2002 the SARS Cov epidemic broke out in Asia. On April 25, 2003, the CDC patent filed and eventually becomes US7,220,852 (the RNA sequence patent) and 7,776,521 (the test methodology patent. These patents give the United States Department of Health and Services Human ability to control commercial exploitation of the SARS coronavirus Dr. Anthony Fauci is nominated for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s Great Global Challenges Scientific Advisory Committee (in office until 2010).

On July 21, 2003, Ralph Baric’s team (using AI23946 and GM63228) filed the U.S. patent. 7,618,802 which made public on November 17, 2009. The Dana Farber Cancer Institute files the U.S. patent. 7,750,123 on a monoclonal antibody to neutralize SARS CoV. This research is supported by several NIH grants including National Institutes of Health Grants A128785, A148436, and A1053822.

On January 6, 2004, the symposium was organized on the theme “SARS and bioterrorism linked to bioterrorism and emerging infectious diseases: antimicrobials, therapeutics and immunomodulators”. In this conference, the term “The New Normal” was introduced by Merck FAUCI AND BARIC start earning !!!In the National Institute of Health, Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) here is the reverse genetic SARS study. AI059136-01. $ 1.7 million total cost, RS Baric .

Project develops integral SARS-CoV infectious cDNA, development of SARS-CoV replicon particles expressing heterologous genes and attempts to adapt SARS-CoV to mice, producing a model pathogen mouse for SARS-CoV infection. Then, subsequently, the same carries out the research “Reshaping the coronavirus SARS Genome regulatory network”. RS Baric, PI 10 percent commitment. 7/1 / 04-6 / 30/09. $ 2.1 million.On November 22, 2004, the University of Hong Kong patents the spike protein associated with SARS on CoV and pursues US patent 7,491,489.

This is taken from a long article. Read the rest here: veteranstoday.com

Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Trackback from your site.