Cognitive Warfare

Note: What Craig states as a NATO plan has been the clandestine activity of the CIA/Mossad/Five Eyes upon the American and European People and indeed upon the world's population for the last seventy-plus years. It has grown in sophistication and power as technology has advanced. Its purpose is to enslave people's minds, to make them willing to be enslaved, poisoned, self-mutilated, and suicided,to actually participate in their own genocide. 

Mister Lachney will speak about this "Cognitive Warfare" as if it is some "works in panning."

It is not that it is present and active and killing tens of millions of people, as we speak. 

By Craig Lachney

The US-led NATO military cartel has tested novel modes of hybrid warfare against its self-declared adversaries, including economic warfare, cyber warfare, information warfare, and psychological warfare.

Now, NATO is spinning out an entirely new kind of combat it has branded cognitive warfare. Described as the “weaponization of brain sciences,” the new method involves “hacking the individual” by exploiting “the vulnerabilities of the human brain” in order to implement more sophisticated “social engineering.”

Until recently, NATO had divided war into five different operational domains: air, land, sea, space, and cyber. But with its development of cognitive warfare strategies, the military alliance is discussing a new, sixth level: the “human domain.”

The brain will be the battlefield of the 21st century,” the report stressed. “Humans are the contested domain,” and “future conflicts will likely occur amongst the people digitally first and physically thereafter in proximity to hubs of political and economic power.”
In a chilling disclosure, the report said explicitly that “the objective of Cognitive Warfare is to harm societies and not only the military.”

With entire civilian populations in NATO’s crosshairs, the report emphasized that Western militaries must work more closely with academia to weaponize social sciences and human sciences and help the alliance develop its cognitive warfare capacities.
The study described this phenomenon as “the militarization of brain science.” But it appears clear that NATO’s development of cognitive warfare will lead to a militarization of all aspects of human society and psychology, from the most intimate of social relationships to the mind itself.

Today’s progresses in nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science (NBIC), boosted by the seemingly unstoppable march of a triumphant troika made of Artificial Intelligence, Big Data and civilisational ‘digital addiction’ have created a much more ominous prospect: an embedded fifth column, where everyone, unbeknownst to him or her, is behaving according to the plans of one of our competitors.”

Think of it as Mind Control 2.0, and this time they’re throwing the whole book at you.

In these documents, the braintrust at NATO’s creative warfare division has come up with some great ways to articulate the purpose and need for looking at your brain (and everyone else’s) as a new theatre of war. Here are some of the quotes:

If kinetic power cannot defeat the enemy, psychology and related behavioural and social sciences stand to fill the void.”

“It will support the combat operations by providing potential courses of action for the whole surrounding Human Environment including enemy forces, but also determining key human elements such as the Cognitive center of gravity, the desired behaviour as the end state.”

“Today’s progresses in nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science (NBIC), boosted by the seemingly unstoppable march of a triumphant troika made of Artificial Intelligence, Big Data and civilisational ‘digital addiction’ have created a much more ominous prospect: an embedded fifth column, where everyone, unbeknownst to him or her, is behaving according to the plans of one of our competitors.”

“The human domain might well be the decisive domain, wherein multi-domain operations achieve the commander’s effect. The five first domains can give tactical and operational victories; only the human domain can achieve the final and full victory.”

“Cognitive warfare is not only a fight against what we think, but it’s rather a fight against the way we think, if we can change the way people think… it’s much more powerful and it goes way beyond the information [warfare] and psyops.”

“It’s crucial to understand that it’s a game on our cognition, on the way our brain processes information and turns it into knowledge, rather than solely a game on information or on psychological aspects of our brains. It’s not only an action against what we think, but also an action against the way we think, the way we process information and turn it into knowledge.”

“This is extremely important for us in the military… it has the potential, by developing new weapons and ways of harming the brain, it has the potential to engage neuroscience and technology in many, many different approaches to influence human ecology… because you all know that it’s very easy to turn a civilian technology into a military one.”

“Cognitive warfare seeks to change not only what people think, but also how they act… Attacks against the cognitive domain involve the integration of cyber, disinformation/misinformation, psychological, and social-engineering capabilities.”

“Cognitive warfare positions the mind as a battle space and contested domain. Its objective is to sow dissonance, instigate conflicting narratives, polarize opinion, and radicalize groups. Cognitive warfare can motivate people to act in ways that can disrupt or fragment an otherwise cohesive society.”

Executive Summary: We’re figuring out how to weaponize the internet and use the full power of all technologies to alter the way people think and how the brain works, so that we can more easily lord over an abusable class of automatons and robots who unconsciously carry out military orders while believing they are in control of their own thoughts and behavior.

There’s also an eye-catching phrase in these documents which I hadn’t previously heard before… “psychocultural warfare.” Hmmm… at face value it sounds like a way to create conflict amongst people by filling their heads full of nefarious BS… and guess what? That’s exactly what it is!

Psychocultural is defined as, “of or relating to the interaction of psychological and cultural factors in the individual’s personality or in the characteristics of a group.”

So, basically, psychocultural warfare is about weaponizing one’s relationship to themselves and to others. Great. This is more bad news for those of you seekers out there who are still determined to live an amazing life in this system of lies and illusions. It means there will be even more layers of manipulation to sort through in order to find your own sense of authority and purpose. Are you up to the challenge? I hope so.

Conclusion:
Self-sabotage is truly epidemic today, which is no wonder when you consider just how much psychological and social manipulation we endure. Add to that the tremendous pressures on our most basic needs of security, self-esteem, and connection, and the chronic stress of always having some major crisis to fear. The natural reaction to an environment this hostile is to revert to self-protective behavior… self-sabotage.

And this is precisely the point of psychocultural warfare, cognitive warfare, and all the mind control in our world. To sideline you. To assimilate you into a weak, unhealthy and dysfunctional tribe. A tribe of non-protestors, or worse yet, a tribe of boot-lickers. Of broken people who cannot stand on their own, nor have any sense of self-determination.

We are under attack. You are under attack. They want to control, conquer and kill your individuality, which isn’t easy to do, considering that human beings have a built-in psychological drive pushing us towards individuation.

In the next 15 years, if large numbers of people don’t become consciously resistant to the overall mind control exerted on society, we’re going to see many more people who really truly resemble androids. People induce this themselves, by looking out at the world and saying, it’s too dangerous for me to tell the truth, or to say what I really believe, or express how I really feel. It’s much better if I fabricate a completely synthetic personality that’s going to sit back here and remain passive.